Scott Martin

ContactScott Martin has been covering the financial markets since 1996 and the securities business since 2001. He was a long-time columnist for Research, market writer at CNNfn.com, and editor of Buyside; his work currently appears in publications like The Trust Advisor, Institutional Investor, and EmergingMoney.com.
read more ...

SEC, FINRA Repeat Guidance On Branch Office Supervision
Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:59

Tags: compliance

Interesting timing on a joint alert from the SEC and FINRA urging broker-dealer firms to inspect their branch offices.

If you're a private wealth advisor, please join Advisors4Advisors (A4A) to get its full benefits.

Register now, and we will donate $20 of our $60 membership fee to Bubbles The Clown’s financial literacy program, and you can post an icon on your website saying you support Bubbles' 501(c)3 charitable organization.

Plus, get other membership benefits, including:

  • Analysis daily of issues affecting advisors
  • Aggregation of news from dozens of sites targeting wealth managers
  • Reviews by advisors of practice management applications
  • 30 independent experts blogging on advisor business issues
  • 24/7 access to webinars with 50 hours of CFP® CE and 100 hours of IMCA CE
Register Now
   

 

Broker-dealers are already responsible for monitoring what goes on in remote locations. That's part of what makes the new guidance from the regulators so odd.

 

And raising the issue to the status of a joint alert makes the whole thing seem a lot more urgent.

 

While it's good to repeat what every compliance officer should already know, "refresher" lessons like this are usually left to the back pages of regulatory newsletters.

 

They're obviously trying to get ahead of something in the industry, but what?

 

FINRA is cracking down hard on private placement sales practices, but its due diligence probe focuses on the home offices that approve these products for the shelf. Branch staff generally don't have much input there.

 

Are the regulators seeing a wave of other unsuitable product sales? LPL was recently called out for failing to watch its solo practitioners, but the incident in question actually happened years ago.

 

Either way, the message is clear. The lone wolves need to be fenced in.

Comments (0)

Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Login

Banner
Banner
Banner

Comments

Banner

Reviews

Banner