Scott Martin

ContactScott Martin has been covering the financial markets since 1996 and the securities business since 2001. He was a long-time columnist for Research, market writer at CNNfn.com, and editor of Buyside; his work currently appears in publications like The Trust Advisor, Institutional Investor, and EmergingMoney.com.
read more ...

Department Of Labor "Mystified" By Advisor Fears For Lost IRA Commissions
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:59

IRAs are still on the Labor Department's radar when it comes to hammering out just how the fiduciary responsibility of retirement advisors will eventually work, but "run of the mill" commissions may be safe.

If you're a private wealth advisor, please join Advisors4Advisors (A4A) to get its full benefits.

Register now, and we will donate $20 of our $60 membership fee to Bubbles The Clown’s financial literacy program, and you can post an icon on your website saying you support Bubbles' 501(c)3 charitable organization.

Plus, get other membership benefits, including:

  • Analysis daily of issues affecting advisors
  • Aggregation of news from dozens of sites targeting wealth managers
  • Reviews by advisors of practice management applications
  • 30 independent experts blogging on advisor business issues
  • 24/7 access to webinars with 50 hours of CFP® CE and 100 hours of IMCA CE
Register Now
   

 

Phyllis Borzi, head of the Employee Benefits Security Administration and architect of the recent fiduciary debate, is "mystified" over all the angst over advisors and retirement accounts.

 

She is adamant that American workers need to be protected against conflicts of interest, especially in IRA accounts.

 

But she notes that EBSA has turned a blind eye on commissions on basic asset classes in IRAs -- including stocks, bonds, and annuities -- for decades now.

 

As such, she wonders why commission-driven advisors are threatening to pull out of retirement markets entirely if EBSA forces them to act like fiduciaries.

 

It's a good question. Borzi says commissions on "alternative" asset classes have never been exempt from the EBSA fiduciary rules, which is one reason things like private equity rarely show up in retirement accounts beyond "self-directed" IRAs.

 

Still, it's unlikely that the advisors who are complaining about the proposed tighter rules are selling a lot of expensive hedge fund shares to their largely mass-market clients.

 

That just wouldn't be suitable at this level, much less qualify as serving the client's ultimate best interest.

 

Either way, she says the revised rules are coming early next year.

 

Comments (0)

Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Login

Banner
Banner
Banner

Comments

Banner

Reviews

Banner